| Niyamam AI

Displaying 456 - 460 of 494

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between Machincheri Nafeesa et al vs Machincheri Hamza et al regarding boundary fixation

Civil Suit - Boundary Fixation

Original Suit No. 39 of 2013

Tirur

2016-12-02

3 years

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Moli vs Pareeth et al regarding injunction

Civil Suit - Injunction

Original Suit No. 234 of 2014

Tirur

2016-12-02

2 years

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Muhammed Kutty vs Kareem regarding injunction

Civil Suit - Injunction

Original Suit No. 435 of 2014

Tirur

2016-12-02

2 years

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Vazhanthodi Zeenath vs Muneer regarding injunction

Civil Suit - Injunction

ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 286 OF 2015

Tirur

2016-12-15

1 year 16 days

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Pathummu Umma et al vs Chenganasseri Sainaba et al regarding injunction

Civil Suit - Injunction

Original Suit No. 412 of 2014

Tirur

2016-11-17

2 years

Defendant

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

AI & Machine Learning Estimate

These figures are produced by statistical and machine-learning analysis of past court judgments. They are not legal advice and not a prediction about your own case. Every case turns on its own facts — please consult a qualified lawyer before making any decision.

53%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 495 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength Medium Impact

Average Case Duration 3.2 years

Settlement Likelihood 4%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 119 cases)
Tax receipt (in 114 cases)
Sale deed (in 70 cases)
Land Tax Receipt (in 45 cases)
Settlement Deed (in 40 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 262
Defendant Won: 205

205

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

43%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Plaintiff Absence During Hearings

Frequent dismissals occurred due to the plaintiffs being absent during critical court hearings.

Found in 43 cases (43%) High Impact

Lack of Evidence Presented

Plaintiffs often failed to provide necessary evidence to support their claims, leading to case dismissals.

Found in 25 cases (25%) Medium Impact

Failure to Press Case

Many cases were dismissed because they were either not pressed or not pursued by the plaintiffs or their counsel.

Found in 16 cases (16%) Medium Impact

Default Due to Non-Representation

Dismissals occurred due to plaintiffs not having legal representation during court proceedings.

Found in 10 cases (10%) Low Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Plaintiff Absence During Hearings

Lack of Evidence Presented

Failure to Press Case

Default Due to Non-Representation

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?