| Niyamam AI

Displaying 286 - 290 of 492

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between Sunil Mathew vs The South Indian Bank Ltd., The South Indian Bank regarding injunction

Civil Suit

O.S. 80/2022

Kanjirappally

2025-03-10

approximately-3 years 21 days

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between KINARULLA PARAMBATH ROOPA et al vs KIZHAKKUM MURI GULIKAN PARIPALANA SAMITHI et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction

Civil Suit

ORIGINAL SUIT NO 23/2024

Nadapuram

2025-10-09

approximately-1 year 7 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between SURESH vs VANIYAM VEETIL MUHAMMAD ALI et al regarding perpetual prohibitory injunction.

Civil Suit

ORIGINAL SUIT NO 124/2024

Kozhikode District, Kerala State

2025-11-29

approximately-1 year 11 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Shajahan TP vs Moideen P et al regarding Perpetual prohibitory injunction

Civil Suit

ORIGINAL SUIT No. 460 / 2020

Kozhikode

2025-06-02

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Suresh Kumar vs Chicago Constructions International Private Limited et al regarding temporary injunction for unauthorized construction

Civil Suit

OS No. 461/2023

Thiruvananthapuram District

2025-11-01

Defendant

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

AI & Machine Learning Estimate

These figures are produced by statistical and machine-learning analysis of past court judgments. They are not legal advice and not a prediction about your own case. Every case turns on its own facts — please consult a qualified lawyer before making any decision.

53%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 495 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength Medium Impact

Average Case Duration 3.2 years

Settlement Likelihood 4%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 119 cases)
Tax receipt (in 114 cases)
Sale deed (in 70 cases)
Land Tax Receipt (in 45 cases)
Settlement Deed (in 40 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 262
Defendant Won: 205

205

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

50%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Plaintiff Absence During Hearings

Majority of plaintiffs failed due to their absence during critical court hearings.

Found in 50 cases (50%) High Impact

Lack of Evidence Presented

Failure to provide sufficient evidence to support claims was a common reason for dismissal.

Found in 20 cases (20%) Medium Impact

Failure to Prosecute Case

Dismissals occurred when plaintiffs did not press their cases or had no legal representation.

Found in 15 cases (15%) Medium Impact

Settlements Before Hearings

Several cases were dismissed because parties reached settlements prior to court hearings.

Found in 10 cases (10%) Low Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Plaintiff Absence During Hearings

Lack of Evidence Presented

Failure to Prosecute Case

Settlements Before Hearings

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?