| Niyamam AI

Displaying 281 - 285 of 492

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between G.Rajesh et al vs State of Kerala et al regarding injunction.

Civil Suit

OS.No.123/2020

Kollam

2025-09-11

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between G. Haridasan Potty vs Perumon Sree Durga Bhagavathy Temple Devaswom et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction.

Civil Suit

OS. No. 807/2024

Kollam

2025-10-10

approximately-11 months 27 days

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Raveendran Pillai et al vs Kerala State et al regarding injunction.

Civil Suit

OS. No.994/2016

Kollam

2025-04-07

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Anil Kumar Celine Fernandez et al vs Socrates John regarding Injunction

Injunction

OS. No. 307/2017

Kollam

2025-02-03

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between K.M. Mathew et al vs State of Kerala et al regarding encroachment of property

Injunction

O.S 59/2023

Kanjirappally

2025-07-28

approximately-0 years 10 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

AI & Machine Learning Estimate

These figures are produced by statistical and machine-learning analysis of past court judgments. They are not legal advice and not a prediction about your own case. Every case turns on its own facts — please consult a qualified lawyer before making any decision.

53%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 495 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength Medium Impact

Average Case Duration 3.2 years

Settlement Likelihood 4%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 119 cases)
Tax receipt (in 114 cases)
Sale deed (in 70 cases)
Land Tax Receipt (in 45 cases)
Settlement Deed (in 40 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 262
Defendant Won: 205

205

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

50%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Plaintiff Absence During Hearings

Majority of plaintiffs failed due to their absence during critical court hearings.

Found in 50 cases (50%) High Impact

Lack of Evidence Presented

Failure to provide sufficient evidence to support claims was a common reason for dismissal.

Found in 20 cases (20%) Medium Impact

Failure to Prosecute Case

Dismissals occurred when plaintiffs did not press their cases or had no legal representation.

Found in 15 cases (15%) Medium Impact

Settlements Before Hearings

Several cases were dismissed because parties reached settlements prior to court hearings.

Found in 10 cases (10%) Low Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Plaintiff Absence During Hearings

Lack of Evidence Presented

Failure to Prosecute Case

Settlements Before Hearings

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?