| Niyamam AI

Displaying 111 - 115 of 493

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between S. Jessi vs Abdul Siyad regarding temporary injunction against encroachment.

Civil Suit

O. S. No. 343/ 2025

Varkala

2025-12-01

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Sharafudheen vs Nujumudheen regarding temporary injunction

Civil Suit

O. S. No. 315/2025

Varkala, Thiruvananthapuram District

2025-12-03

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Faisy (Abdul Faisy) vs Jaseera regarding permanent prohibitory injunction.

Civil Suit

Original Suit No.127/2022

Thiruvananthapuram District

2025-06-17

approximately-3 years 16 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Remla Sahir vs Shaji.V regarding permanent prohibitory injunction

Civil Suit

ORIGINAL SUIT No. 443/2023

Varkala, Thiruvananthapuram

2025-08-20

approximately-2 years 4 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between THARAVATTATH MARIYAM vs C. K. NASAR et al regarding Permanent Prohibitory and Mandatory Injunction

Civil Suit

ORIGINAL SUIT NO 28/2025

Nadapuram, Kozhikode District, Kerala State

2025-09-12

approximately-7 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

AI & Machine Learning Estimate

These figures are produced by statistical and machine-learning analysis of past court judgments. They are not legal advice and not a prediction about your own case. Every case turns on its own facts — please consult a qualified lawyer before making any decision.

53%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 495 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength Medium Impact

Average Case Duration 3.2 years

Settlement Likelihood 4%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 119 cases)
Tax receipt (in 114 cases)
Sale deed (in 70 cases)
Land Tax Receipt (in 45 cases)
Settlement Deed (in 40 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 262
Defendant Won: 205

205

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

46%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Absence of the Plaintiff

Numerous cases were dismissed due to the plaintiff's absence during hearings or trials.

Found in 46 cases (46%) High Impact

Lack of Evidence

Plaintiffs frequently failed to provide sufficient evidence to support their claims or establish causes of action.

Found in 18 cases (18%) Medium Impact

Default Dismissals

Many cases were dismissed as defaults owing to non-appearance or failure to press the case.

Found in 16 cases (16%) Medium Impact

Lack of Representation

Dismissals often occurred due to plaintiffs lacking legal representation during critical hearings.

Found in 12 cases (12%) Low Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Absence of the Plaintiff

Lack of Evidence

Default Dismissals

Lack of Representation

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?