| Niyamam AI

Displaying 486 - 490 of 751

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between Samson T George et al vs Varghese Bobby Tholath et al regarding construction agreement dispute

Civil Suit

O.S. No. 622/2024

Ernakulam

2025-09-16

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Aloshious George vs Prakash P K regarding property disputes

Civil Suit

O.S No. 180/2025

Ernakulam

2025-09-15

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Philomina Joseph et al vs N.V Paul et al regarding partition and permanent prohibitory injunction

Civil Suit

O.S No. 741/2020

Ernakulam

2026-01-16

approximately-5 years 10 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Joy N T vs Johny et al regarding temporary injunction

Civil Suit

O.S. No. 661/2025

2025-09-26

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Padmadas vs Mani et al regarding fixation of boundary, recovery of possession and permanent prohibitory injunction.

Civil Suit

O.S. No. 1 005/2016

Ernakulam

2025-09-27

approximately-9 years 2 months

Defendant

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

AI & Machine Learning Estimate

These figures are produced by statistical and machine-learning analysis of past court judgments. They are not legal advice and not a prediction about your own case. Every case turns on its own facts — please consult a qualified lawyer before making any decision.

70%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 752 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 5.9 years

Settlement Likelihood 3%

Common Winning Factors:

Sale deed (in 346 cases)
Commission Report (in 306 cases)
Tax receipt (in 262 cases)
Settlement Deed (in 137 cases)
Land Tax Receipt (in 115 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 528
Defendant Won: 195

194

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

32%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Failure to Prove Ownership

Plaintiffs did not provide sufficient evidence to prove ownership or rights over the disputed property.

Found in 32 cases (32%) High Impact

Absence of Plaintiff in Court

Many plaintiffs failed to appear in court, leading to dismissal due to lack of representation.

Found in 18 cases (18%) Medium Impact

Lack of Evidence Presented

Plaintiffs were unable to present adequate evidence to substantiate their claims during the trial.

Found in 17 cases (17%) Medium Impact

Issues with Jurisdiction

Certain suits were dismissed due to improper jurisdiction or lack of authority to hear the case.

Found in 15 cases (15%) Medium Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Failure to Prove Ownership

Absence of Plaintiff in Court

Lack of Evidence Presented

Issues with Jurisdiction

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?