| Niyamam AI

Displaying 196 - 200 of 751

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between KARIMBIL ABDULKHADAR HAJI vs BABURAJ regarding Recovery of possession, Mandatory injunction, Permanent Prohibitory Injunction and for damages.

Civil Suit

Original Suit No. 110/2022

Nadapuram, Kozhikode District, Kerala

2025-08-06

approximately-3 years 6 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Subha Satheesh vs Prabha Raveendran et al regarding final decree application for partition

Final Decree Application

FDIA 5/2023 in OS 89/2022

Nadapuram, Kerala

2025-08-07

approximately-2 years 5 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Peettollathil Sumesh vs Peettollathil Babu et al regarding Recovery of possession.

Civil Suit

ORIGINAL SUIT 80/2024

Nadapuram, Kozhikode District, Kerala.

2025-08-12

approximately-7 years 0 days

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between JASHILNADH. R vs VADAKKAYIL PATHU et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction and declaration

Civil Suit

ORIGINAL SUIT 19/2018

Kozhikode District

2025-08-21

approximately-7 years 6 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between CHERIYA KALLUKKANDIYIL ASYA vs KURUKKANARIYIL MAMMAD et al regarding fixation of boundary and consequential injunction

Civil Suit

Original Suit No. 70/2018

Nadapuram

2025-01-28

Partial

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

AI & Machine Learning Estimate

These figures are produced by statistical and machine-learning analysis of past court judgments. They are not legal advice and not a prediction about your own case. Every case turns on its own facts — please consult a qualified lawyer before making any decision.

70%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 752 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 5.9 years

Settlement Likelihood 3%

Common Winning Factors:

Sale deed (in 346 cases)
Commission Report (in 306 cases)
Tax receipt (in 262 cases)
Settlement Deed (in 137 cases)
Land Tax Receipt (in 115 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 528
Defendant Won: 195

194

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

20%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Failure to Prove Ownership

Plaintiff was unable to demonstrate ownership of the property in question, leading to dismissal of the case.

Found in 20 cases (20%) High Impact

Absence of Plaintiff in Court

Multiple cases were dismissed due to the plaintiffs' non-appearance or lack of representation during hearings.

Found in 18 cases (18%) High Impact

Insufficient Evidence Provided

Plaintiffs consistently failed to present adequate evidence to support their claims, resulting in dismissals.

Found in 15 cases (15%) Medium Impact

Previous Legal Decisions Impacting Claims

Dismissals occurred due to prior legal determinations that barred the plaintiffs from pursuing their claims.

Found in 14 cases (14%) Medium Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Failure to Prove Ownership

Absence of Plaintiff in Court

Insufficient Evidence Provided

Previous Legal Decisions Impacting Claims

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?