| Niyamam AI

Displaying 1061 - 1065 of 1217

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between Erachampattu Muhammed Kassim et al vs M.Sreenivasan regarding lease and rent control

Rent Control - Kerala Building (Lease and Rent Control) Act

RENT CONTROL PETITION NO. 89 OF 2016

Tirur

2018-11-02

2 years

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Erachampattu Muhammed Kassim et al vs Sujatha Sreenivasan et al regarding lease and rent

Rent Control Petition

RENT CONTROL PETITION NO. 91 OF 2016

Tirur

2018-11-02

2 years

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Erachampattu Muhammed Kassim et al vs M.Sreenivasan regarding rent control petition

Rent Control Petition

RENT CONTROL PETITION NO. 90 OF 2016

Tirur

2018-11-02

2 years

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Mundekkatt Muhammad Haji vs Kadavath Muhammad regarding Rent Control Petition

Rent Control Petition

RENT CONTROL PETITION NO. 62 OF 2014

Tirur

2018-10-27

4 years

Dismissed

View Full Details

Case between Kalathil Parambil Enthen's daughter et al vs Sasidharan regarding rented premises dispute

Petition under Kerala Building (Lease and rent control) Act

RENT CONTROL PETITION NO. 30 OF 2018

Tirur

2018-10-26

Not mentioned

Defendant

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

AI & Machine Learning Estimate

These figures are produced by statistical and machine-learning analysis of past court judgments. They are not legal advice and not a prediction about your own case. Every case turns on its own facts — please consult a qualified lawyer before making any decision.

82%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 1,217 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 2.8 years

Settlement Likelihood 7%

Common Winning Factors:

Lawyer Notice (in 267 cases)
Postal receipt (in 236 cases)
Commission Report (in 192 cases)
Acknowledgment card (in 167 cases)
Reply Notice (in 131 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 999
Defendant Won: 190

190

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

42%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Lack of Representation by Plaintiff

Many cases were dismissed due to the plaintiff's absence or lack of counsel present during the hearing.

Found in 42 cases (42%) High Impact

Petition Not Pressed

Numerous petitions were dismissed as not pressed by the plaintiffs or their counsels, indicating a lack of pursuit.

Found in 27 cases (27%) Medium Impact

Failure to Prove Case

Plaintiffs often failed to present adequate evidence or establish their claims, resulting in dismissals.

Found in 12 cases (12%) Medium Impact

Non-compliance with Court Requirements

Failure to meet statutory requirements or procedural rules led to several cases being dismissed.

Found in 10 cases (10%) Low Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Lack of Representation by Plaintiff

Petition Not Pressed

Failure to Prove Case

Non-compliance with Court Requirements

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?