| Niyamam AI

Displaying 1041 - 1045 of 1217

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between David Paul vs M/s LWC Events LLP et al regarding rent control proceedings

Rent Control Petition

R.C.P. No. 191/2024

Ernakulam

2025-08-02

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Joy K.A. vs Laiju Mathew et al regarding rent control and compliance

Rent Control Petition

R.C.P. No. 134/2020

ERNAKULAM

2025-05-19

approximately-2 years 2 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Mini Baby vs Central Bank of India regarding Rent Control Petition

Rent Control Petition

R.C.P. No. 22/2023

Ernakulam

2025-08-01

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Capt. John Robert vs Mrs. Jancy Antony regarding rent control compliance

Rent Control Petition

R.C.P. No. 05/2025

Ernakulam

2025-06-04

2 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Mathew Ninan et al vs Sujith P.S. et al regarding Rent Control

Rent Control

R.C.P. No. 12/2024

Ernakulam

2025-06-03

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

AI & Machine Learning Estimate

These figures are produced by statistical and machine-learning analysis of past court judgments. They are not legal advice and not a prediction about your own case. Every case turns on its own facts — please consult a qualified lawyer before making any decision.

82%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 1,217 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 2.8 years

Settlement Likelihood 7%

Common Winning Factors:

Lawyer Notice (in 267 cases)
Postal receipt (in 236 cases)
Commission Report (in 192 cases)
Acknowledgment card (in 167 cases)
Reply Notice (in 131 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 999
Defendant Won: 190

190

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

36%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Absence of Plaintiff or Counsel

Many cases were dismissed due to the plaintiff or their counsel being absent during hearings.

Found in 36 cases (36%) High Impact

Failure to Prove Claims

Plaintiffs often failed to present adequate evidence to support their claims, leading to dismissals.

Found in 25 cases (25%) Medium Impact

Petition Not Pressed

Several cases were dismissed as the petitioners chose not to pursue their petitions, leading to non-pressing.

Found in 18 cases (18%) Medium Impact

Lack of Jurisdiction

Some cases were dismissed due to the court lacking jurisdiction over the matters presented by the plaintiffs.

Found in 11 cases (11%) Low Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Absence of Plaintiff or Counsel

Failure to Prove Claims

Petition Not Pressed

Lack of Jurisdiction

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?