| Niyamam AI

Displaying 1026 - 1030 of 1217

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between Harees S. vs Rafeek M.A. regarding rent arrears

Rent Control Petition

R.C.P. No. 131/2024

Ernakulam

2025-11-15

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Rajeendran P vs M/s Chiyang Chinese Restaurant and E.K. Antony regarding rent arrears

Rent Control Petition

R.C.P. No. 36/2022

Ernakulam

2025-11-06

4 years 6 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between John P. Koshy vs Muniswami Arunachalam regarding rent arrears

Rent Control Petition

R.C.P. No. 55/2025

Ernakulam

2025-11-03

null

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Ramachandran N. Nair et al vs Shaji M.M. regarding rent control proceedings.

Rent Control Petition

R.C.P. No. 147/2024

Ernakulam

2025-11-03

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Jaya Surendran vs RAHA Ayurveda Hospital et al regarding eviction.

Rent Control Petition

R.C.P. No.11/2025

Ernakulam

2025-12-15

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

AI & Machine Learning Estimate

These figures are produced by statistical and machine-learning analysis of past court judgments. They are not legal advice and not a prediction about your own case. Every case turns on its own facts — please consult a qualified lawyer before making any decision.

82%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 1,217 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 2.8 years

Settlement Likelihood 7%

Common Winning Factors:

Lawyer Notice (in 267 cases)
Postal receipt (in 236 cases)
Commission Report (in 192 cases)
Acknowledgment card (in 167 cases)
Reply Notice (in 131 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 999
Defendant Won: 190

190

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

23%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Absence of Plaintiff or Counsel

Multiple cases involved plaintiffs or their counsel failing to appear, leading to dismissal for default.

Found in 23 cases (23%) High Impact

Petition Not Pressed

Several petitions were dismissed as not pressed, often due to the counsel's decision or lack of evidence.

Found in 21 cases (21%) High Impact

Failure to Prove Case

Plaintiffs often failed to adequately prove their claims or establish necessary facts, resulting in dismissal.

Found in 17 cases (17%) Medium Impact

Lack of Statutory Compliance

Some cases were dismissed due to failure to comply with statutory requirements or procedural rules.

Found in 13 cases (13%) Medium Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Absence of Plaintiff or Counsel

Petition Not Pressed

Failure to Prove Case

Lack of Statutory Compliance

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?