| Niyamam AI

Displaying 566 - 570 of 1218

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between Muhammedkutty vs Komu regarding eviction of tenant

Rent Control Petition

RENT CONTROL PETITION NO. 24 OF 2016

Tirur

2019-08-27

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Muhammedkutty vs Komu regarding eviction of tenant

Rent Control Petition

RENT CONTROL PETITION NO. 25 OF 2016

Tirur

2019-08-27

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Safiya et al vs The Secretary, Department of Posts et al regarding eviction under the Kerala Building (Lease and Rent Control) Act

Rent Control Petition

RCP 85/2016

Tirur

2019-08-27

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Erachampatt Raseena vs M.Sreenivasan regarding eviction due to bona fide need.

Rent Control Petition

R.C.P. No. 81/2016

Tirur

2019-08-29

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Erachampatt Raseena vs M.Sreenivasan regarding eviction of tenant for bona fide need.

Rent Control Petition

RCP 81/2016

Tirur

2019-08-29

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

AI & Machine Learning Estimate

These figures are produced by statistical and machine-learning analysis of past court judgments. They are not legal advice and not a prediction about your own case. Every case turns on its own facts — please consult a qualified lawyer before making any decision.

82%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 1,217 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 2.8 years

Settlement Likelihood 7%

Common Winning Factors:

Lawyer Notice (in 267 cases)
Postal receipt (in 236 cases)
Commission Report (in 192 cases)
Acknowledgment card (in 167 cases)
Reply Notice (in 131 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 999
Defendant Won: 190

191

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

40%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Absence of Petitioner or Counsel

Plaintiffs frequently failed to appear in court or lacked legal representation during hearings.

Found in 40 cases (40%) High Impact

Petition Not Pressed

Many plaintiffs did not press their petitions, resulting in dismissals for lack of prosecution.

Found in 30 cases (30%) High Impact

Failure to Prove Claims

Plaintiffs often could not substantiate their claims, leading to dismissals for lack of evidence.

Found in 18 cases (18%) Medium Impact

Inadequate Compliance with Procedure

Petitioners commonly failed to follow necessary legal procedures, contributing to case dismissals.

Found in 12 cases (12%) Low Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Absence of Petitioner or Counsel

Petition Not Pressed

Failure to Prove Claims

Inadequate Compliance with Procedure

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?