| Niyamam AI

Displaying 501 - 505 of 594

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between Sree Gokulam Chit & Finance Co-Pvt.Ltd. vs Manala Cheerangan regarding cheque dishonour

Criminal Case - Cheque Dishonour

S.T. No. 4/2017

Tirur

2017-05-02

1 year 5 months

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Challenge Motors vs Radhika regarding Section 138 of the Negotiable Instrument Act

Criminal Case - Section 138 of the Negotiable Instrument Act

ST/10/2016

Tirur, Malappuram

2017-04-24

0 years, 10 months, 24 days

Unknown

View Full Details

Case between Challenge Motors et al vs Radhika et al regarding dishonour of cheque

Criminal Case - Dishonour of Cheque (Section 138 of N.I. Act)

S.T. No:28/2016

Tirur

2017-04-24

1 year

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Challenge Motors Rep by its Propritor Saithalavi et al vs Radhika et al regarding Cheque Dishonour under Section 138 N.I. Act

Criminal Case - Cheque Dishonour

S.T. No:29/2016

Tirur

2017-04-24

1 year

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Arakkal Musthafa vs Basheer Meenattil regarding dishonour of cheque

Criminal Case - Cheque Dishonour under Section 138 of N.I. Act

S.T. No. 159/2015

Tirur

2017-03-24

2 years

Defendant

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

AI & Machine Learning Estimate

These figures are produced by statistical and machine-learning analysis of past court judgments. They are not legal advice and not a prediction about your own case. Every case turns on its own facts — please consult a qualified lawyer before making any decision.

37%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 594 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength Medium Impact

Average Case Duration 3.6 years

Settlement Likelihood 10%

Common Winning Factors:

Cheque (in 220 cases)
Postal receipt (in 136 cases)
Acknowledgment card (in 87 cases)
Cheque Return Memo (in 83 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 67 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 222
Defendant Won: 342

342

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

45%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Withdrawal of the Complaint

Plaintiffs frequently withdrew their complaints, resulting in the acquittal of the accused under various sections.

Found in 45 cases (45%) High Impact

Failure to Prove Liability

Plaintiffs often failed to establish that the accused was liable for the cheque dishonour.

Found in 24 cases (24%) Medium Impact

Complainant's Absence in Court

A significant number of cases involved the complainant's absence, leading to acquittals.

Found in 15 cases (15%) Medium Impact

Insufficient Evidence Presented

Many plaintiffs failed to provide sufficient evidence to support their claims against the accused.

Found in 11 cases (11%) Low Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Withdrawal of the Complaint

Failure to Prove Liability

Complainant's Absence in Court

Insufficient Evidence Presented

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?