| Niyamam AI

Displaying 491 - 495 of 2447

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between Maheswari Finance and Investment vs Hasnath.C.K regarding realization of money

Civil Suit

ORIGINAL SUIT No. 716/2024

Kozhikode

2025-09-29

approximately-3 years 26 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Civil Suit

ORIGINAL SUIT No. 396/2024

Kozhikode

2025-09-29

approximately-3 years 4 months

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Sree Krishana Bankers vs Binu. M regarding money recovery

Original Suit

ORIGINAL SUIT No. 150/2025

Kozhikode

2025-09-29

approximately-2 years 2 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Subramanian M vs N.Udayakumar regarding return of money.

Civil Suit

ORIGINAL SUIT No.341/2025

Kozhikode

2025-09-29

approximately-3 years 1 month 1 day

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between M/s.S.B.Distributors vs Abdul Latheef regarding recovery of money.

Civil Suit

ORIGINAL SUIT No. 535/2024

Kozhikode

2025-10-06

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

AI & Machine Learning Estimate

These figures are produced by statistical and machine-learning analysis of past court judgments. They are not legal advice and not a prediction about your own case. Every case turns on its own facts — please consult a qualified lawyer before making any decision.

89%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 2,443 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 3.9 years

Settlement Likelihood 6%

Common Winning Factors:

Statement of Account (in 538 cases)
Loan Application (in 488 cases)
Postal receipt (in 435 cases)
Demand Promissory Note (in 354 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 290 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 2163
Defendant Won: 218

217

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

28%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Default Due to Non-Payment of Batta

Many petitions were dismissed for failing to pay the required batta, leading to defaults.

Found in 28 cases (28%) Medium Impact

Lack of Evidence of Means to Pay

Petitions were dismissed due to insufficient evidence showing respondents' ability to pay the owed amount.

Found in 23 cases (23%) Medium Impact

Absence of the Plaintiff

Numerous suits were dismissed because the plaintiff failed to appear in court during the proceedings.

Found in 22 cases (22%) Medium Impact

Failure to Press the Suit

Several cases were dismissed as plaintiffs did not press their claims or provide representation.

Found in 20 cases (20%) Medium Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Default Due to Non-Payment of Batta

Lack of Evidence of Means to Pay

Absence of the Plaintiff

Failure to Press the Suit

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?