| Niyamam AI

Displaying 1186 - 1190 of 2454

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between J.K. Enterprises vs Shoukathali K.K. regarding realization of money

Civil Suit

O.S. No.342/2023

Ernakulam

2024-07-22

approximately-3 years 7 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between M/s. Syndicate Bank vs Mishal Varghese et al regarding realisation of money

Civil Suit

O.S No. 242/2020

Ernakulam

2024-07-24

approximately-3 years 9 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Canara Bank vs Praveen M.V regarding realisation of money

Civil Suit

O.S. No. 683/2023

Ernakulam

2024-07-25

approximately-7 years 5 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between M/s. Kerala Gramin Bank vs Saji.K.P., Antony Ranson regarding realisation of money.

Civil Suit

O.S No. 640/2021

Ernakulam

2024-07-26

approximately-9 years 6 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Union Bank of India vs Manu Prasad regarding realization of money

Civil Suit

O.S. No.14/2024

Ernakulam

2024-07-27

approximately-4 years

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

AI & Machine Learning Estimate

These figures are produced by statistical and machine-learning analysis of past court judgments. They are not legal advice and not a prediction about your own case. Every case turns on its own facts — please consult a qualified lawyer before making any decision.

89%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 2,443 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 3.9 years

Settlement Likelihood 6%

Common Winning Factors:

Statement of Account (in 538 cases)
Loan Application (in 488 cases)
Postal receipt (in 435 cases)
Demand Promissory Note (in 354 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 290 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 2163
Defendant Won: 218

222

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

42%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Default Due to Non-Payment of Batta

Plaintiffs frequently failed to pay the required batta, resulting in case dismissal.

Found in 42 cases (42%) High Impact

Lack of Evidence of Means to Pay

Many petitions were dismissed due to insufficient evidence proving the defendant's ability to pay debts.

Found in 20 cases (20%) Medium Impact

Absence of the Petitioner

Cases were often dismissed because the petitioner did not appear in court during proceedings.

Found in 18 cases (18%) Medium Impact

Failure to Present Necessary Documents

Petitions were dismissed for lack of required documentation to support the claims.

Found in 15 cases (15%) Low Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Default Due to Non-Payment of Batta

Lack of Evidence of Means to Pay

Absence of the Petitioner

Failure to Present Necessary Documents

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?