| Niyamam AI

Displaying 1051 - 1055 of 2454

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between The Federal Bank Ltd. vs Gigymon P.G et al regarding realization of money

Civil Suit

OS No. 21 / 2021

2024-09-05

approximately-14 years 5 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Kerala Gramin Bank vs Kuriachan P.J et al regarding realization of money.

Civil Suit

OS No. 34/2020

2024-11-05

approximately-4 years 0 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Fortune Chits and Investments vs P.U.Scaria regarding realization of money.

Civil Suit

OS No. 56/2020

Kolenchery

2024-06-29

approximately-3 years 26 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Kerala Gramin Bank vs Vipin Venugopal et al regarding recovery of money.

Civil Suit

OS. No.04/2021

Kolenchery

2024-03-14

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Anooja P. A vs Jerry James et al regarding recovery of money

Civil Suit

O.S No. 739/2021

ERNAKULAM

2024-12-02

approximately-4 years 3 months

Defendant

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

AI & Machine Learning Estimate

These figures are produced by statistical and machine-learning analysis of past court judgments. They are not legal advice and not a prediction about your own case. Every case turns on its own facts — please consult a qualified lawyer before making any decision.

89%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 2,443 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 3.9 years

Settlement Likelihood 6%

Common Winning Factors:

Statement of Account (in 538 cases)
Loan Application (in 488 cases)
Postal receipt (in 435 cases)
Demand Promissory Note (in 354 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 290 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 2163
Defendant Won: 218

222

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

27%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Default Due to Non-Payment of Batta

Plaintiff's petition was dismissed for failing to pay required court fees or costs.

Found in 27 cases (27%) High Impact

Lack of Evidence to Support Claims

Plaintiff failed to provide sufficient evidence to demonstrate that the defendant had the means to pay the debt.

Found in 24 cases (24%) High Impact

Absence of the Plaintiff

The plaintiff's absence during hearings led to the dismissal of their case.

Found in 22 cases (22%) High Impact

Failure to Press the Suit

Cases were dismissed when the plaintiffs or their counsel did not actively pursue the suit.

Found in 20 cases (20%) Medium Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Default Due to Non-Payment of Batta

Lack of Evidence to Support Claims

Absence of the Plaintiff

Failure to Press the Suit

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?