Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S. No. 537/2022

Case between Zachariah Jose et al vs M/s. Skyline Green Turf Apartment Owners Association et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction

Court
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOTTAYAM
Judge
Smt. Indu. P. Raj
Order Date
2025-07-23
Duration
approximately-2 years 10 months
Case Closed
Wed, 07/23/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

This suit is filed by the plaintiffs, who are occupants of the apartments in Skyline Green Turf Apartment Complex, for a permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendants. The plaintiffs claim that the defendants are attempting to amend the association's bye laws illegally to impose equal maintenance charges, which should be based on apartment size.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The suit was dismissed as the court found that the online meetings conducted by the defendants did not constitute a violation of the bye laws. The plaintiffs were unable to establish any real illegality or prejudice arising from the action of the defendants.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit was dismissed as the court found that the online meetings conducted by the defendants did not constitute a violation of the bye laws. The plaintiffs were unable to establish any real illegality or prejudice arising from the action of the defendants.
Key Reasoning:
The defendants acted in accordance with the bye laws, which do not expressly prohibit online meetings.
Why Defendant Won:
The defendants acted in accordance with the bye laws, which do not expressly prohibit online meetings.
Supporting Evidence
It is to be admitted that it is not specifically prohibited by the Bye Law too. So, it cannot be said that it is a clear violation of the registered Bye Law or the act is illegal or arbitrary.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence from aforesaid discussions I am of the view that there is no order of permanent prohibitory injunction restraining the defendants and men under them from convening the Annual general body Meeting and election to managing committee of the 1st defendant association on online zoom platform in violation of bye Laws of 1st defendant association.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Zachariah Jose
Party Age
41
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Biju Zachariah
Party Age
52
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Titus George
Party Age
39
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
M/s. Skyline Green Turf Apartment Owners Association
Relation
represented by its Secretary
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
The President, M/s Skyline Green Turf Apartment Owners Association
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
The Secretary, M/s. Skyline Green Turf Apartment Owners Association
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
The Treasurer, M/s. Skyline Green Turf Apartment Owners Association
Plaintiffs Documents
True copy of the Bye Law of Skyline Green Turf Apartment Owners Association, Copy of Notice to convene the Annual General Body meeting, Copy of the Agenda of the Annual General Body Meeting, True Copy of the reply issued by the District Registrar Kottayam, Copy of the petition, Copy of the reply issued by the District Registrar Kottayam, Copy of the E-Mail of the notice of the Annual General Body meeting, Copy of the E-Mail of the Zoom Link for the Annual General Body meeting.
Defendants Documents
True copy of the minutes of meeting of the extra ordinary general body meeting, True copy of the minutes of meeting of general body meeting.

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
George Itty T
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Rajeev P Nair
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Permanent Injunction
Outcome: Refused
Description:
The plaintiffs sought a permanent prohibitory injunction to prevent the defendants from convening the annual general body meeting online.
Evidence:
Hence from aforesaid discussions I am of the view that there is no order of permanent prohibitory injunction restraining the defendants and men under them from convening the Annual general body Meeting and election to managing committee of the 1st defendant association on online zoom platform in violation of bye Laws of 1st defendant association.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Bye Law of Skyline Green Turf Apartment Owners Association
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The document outlines the regulations governing the association, relevant to the proceedings.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Notice to convene the Annual General Body meeting
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Notice issued for the upcoming meeting, central to the dispute.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Agenda of the Annual General Body Meeting
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Details the agenda for the meeting, important for understanding the purpose of the meeting.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Reply issued by the District Registrar Kottayam
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Response from the registrar regarding the authority of the managing committee, relevant to the allegations.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Petition
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Document filed mentioning the concerns of the plaintiffs.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Reply issued by the District Registrar Kottayam
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Another response from the registrar about the conducting of the meeting.
Reference:
Ext.A6
Document Type: E-Mail of the notice of the Annual General Body meeting
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Email notification regarding the meeting that the plaintiffs were contesting.
Reference:
Ext.A7
Document Type: E-Mail of the Zoom Link for the Annual General Body meeting
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Link to access the meeting, central to the plaintiffs' concerns.
Reference:
Ext.A8
Document Type: Minutes of meeting of the extraordinary general body meeting
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Minutes recording the decisions made during the general body meeting, providing context to the defendants' claims.
Reference:
Ext.B1
Document Type: Minutes of meeting of general body meeting
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Records details of the actions taken during a regular meeting, relevant to the ongoing issues.
Reference:
Ext.B2

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Property and Possession Disputes
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Kottayam
Common Reasons
Violation of bye laws
Case Code
Case between Zachariah Jose et al vs M/s. Skyline Green Turf Apartment Owners Association et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
Case Code Year
Case between Zachariah Jose et al vs M/s. Skyline Green Turf Apartment Owners Association et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction

Quick Facts

Location
Kottayam
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Kottayam
Case Filed
Sat, 07/09/2022 - 12:00
Case Closed
Wed, 07/23/2025 - 12:00
From
Sun, 06/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Thu, 07/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Apartment Owners Association

Similar Cases

Case between Reena Philip vs Sachin V Visavadia, Tony Thomas regarding interim mandatory injunction
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Arun R Nair vs Panjos Garden Apartment Owner’s Association et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Paul T.V vs Olive Iantha Owners Association regarding injunction.
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Westfort Gardens Apartment Owners Association vs Anoop Rishin regarding arrears of monthly maintenance and contributions.
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Sarith. S. vs Yasoram Pancharatna Apartment Owners Association regarding declaration and Injunction
THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won