Case Summary
Yesudasan filed a suit for injunction against Simon and others. The case was dismissed for default as both sides were absent.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit was dismissed due to the plaintiff's absence and lack of instructions from the plaintiff's counsel.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
Suit dismissed for default.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Yesudasan
- Party Age
- 52
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Simon
- Party Age
- 40
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Vincent
- Party Age
- 48
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Bindhu
- Party Age
- 35
- Relation
- W/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- John Britto
- Party Age
- 19
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Minimol
- Party Age
- 18
- Relation
- D/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Vinayachandran. V.
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Remesh Kumar
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Injunction
Outcome:
Not Decided
Description:
Plaintiff sought an injunction under section 26(1) of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.
Evidence:
This suit is filed by the plaintiff for injunction u/s 26(1) u/O VII Rule 1 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Yesudasan vs Simon et al regarding injunction.
Case Code Year
Case between Yesudasan vs Simon et al regarding injunction.