Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS. No. 591/2017

Case between V.Radhakrishnan et al vs SNDP Yogam et al regarding Realisation of Money

Court
IN THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM.
Judge
Smt. Ragi.S.
Order Date
2025-06-02
Duration
Case Closed
Mon, 06/02/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiffs, V.Radhakrishnan and Pushpangadhan, filed a suit for the realization of money against the defendants, which include various representatives of the SNDP Yogam and Kollam SNDP Union. The case was dismissed due to the plaintiffs' absence in court during the trial.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court dismissed the case for default as the plaintiff failed to appear and provide any evidence.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the case for default as the plaintiff failed to appear and provide any evidence.
Key Reasoning:
The plaintiff was absent and no representation was made.
Why Defendant Won:
Not available
Supporting Evidence
The plaintiff remained absent and no affidavit seen filed.

Judgment Evidence:

As the plaintiff not ready to adduce any evidence, suit dismissed for default.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
V.Radhakrishnan
Party Age
52
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Pushpangadhan
Party Age
50
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
SNDP Yogam
Relation
Represented by
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Vellappalli Nadesan
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Kollam SNDP Union
Relation
Represented by
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Rajendran
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Mohansanker
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
S.Chandrasenan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
D.Sajeev Babu
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
George Mathews
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
A.Nisar
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
K. Dharmarajan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
S.Navajyoth
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
T. Sapru
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
K.Jayan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sugathan M.P.
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Dismissed
Description:
The suit was dismissed for default due to the plaintiff's absence and lack of evidence.
Evidence:
As the plaintiff not ready to adduce any evidence, suit dismissed for default.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Common Reasons
Realisation of Money
Case Code
Case between V.Radhakrishnan et al vs SNDP Yogam et al regarding Realisation of Money
Case Code Year
Case between V.Radhakrishnan et al vs SNDP Yogam et al regarding Realisation of Money

Quick Facts

Location
Kollam
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Case Filed
Sun, 01/01/2017 - 12:00
Case Closed
Mon, 06/02/2025 - 12:00
From
Thu, 05/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Mon, 06/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between M/s. Indian Overseas Bank, Chemmakkad vs Sunil.L.S et al regarding Realisation of Money
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between K.Shamsudeen vs Sreedharan Pillai regarding Realisation of Money
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between UCO Bank vs Hussain.A et al regarding Realisation of Money.
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Ajas Basheer vs Lekha.T regarding Realisation of Money
IN THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Gopakumar vs K.S.Abdul Manaf regarding Realisation of Money
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM.
Civil Suit Defendant Won