Case Summary
V.O. Thomas, the plaintiff, and Thankachan Puthanpurayil, the defendant, were involved in a suit that was finally heard on October 30, 2025. The matter was settled in terms of an agreement, and the plaintiff did not want to proceed with the case.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit was not pressed and therefore dismissed.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
Hence he did not want to proceed with the case. Suit not pressed and therefore dismissed.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- V.O. Thomas
- Party Age
- 60
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Thankachan Puthanpurayil
- Party Age
- 60
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- R. Gaganan
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- K. Krishnakumar
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Malu Johnson
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- M.D. Devasia
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Vaikom
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between V.O. Thomas vs Thankachan Puthanpurayil regarding settlement of suit.
Case Code Year
Case between V.O. Thomas vs Thankachan Puthanpurayil regarding settlement of suit.
Case Flags
Out-of-Court Settlement