Case Summary
Visakh R. filed a suit against Ronak Radhakrishna Pillai for a permanent prohibitory injunction. The case was dismissed for default as the plaintiff was absent.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the suit for default due to the absence of the plaintiff.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
Not available
Not available
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
The suit dismissed for default.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Visakh R.
- Party Age
- 41
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Ronak Radhakrishna Pillai
- Party Age
- 39
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- K.G. Bindhu
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Chithra D.S.
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Lizzy George
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- S. Anil Kumar
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Akhil B.
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Permanent Injunction
Outcome:
Refused
Description:
Suit dismissed for default.
Evidence:
Suit dismissed for default.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Visakh R. vs Ronak Radhakrishna Pillai regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
Case Code Year
Case between Visakh R. vs Ronak Radhakrishna Pillai regarding permanent prohibitory injunction