Case Summary
The case involves Vipina Vijayan and several defendants. The court dismissed the suit due to the plaintiff's continuous absence and lack of representation.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit was dismissed for non prosecution due to the plaintiff's absence and lack of representation during several hearings.
Key Reasoning:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Reason not clearly mentioned
Why Defendant Won:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Reason not clearly mentioned
Supporting Evidence
Not available
Judgment Evidence:
Hence suit dismissed for non prosecution.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Vipina Vijayan
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Geetha Suresh
- Party Age
- 55
- Relation
- D/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Suresh P.S.
- Party Age
- 57
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Krishnakumar
- Party Age
- 28
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Jaya Sunil
- Party Age
- 57
- Relation
- D/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Sunil Kumar
- Party Age
- 58
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Syed Muhammed Salih
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- N.K. Shyju
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Archana Mithran
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Dismissed
Description:
The suit was dismissed for non-prosecution due to the plaintiff's continuous absence.
Evidence:
Hence suit dismissed for non prosecution.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Vipina Vijayan et al vs Geetha Suresh et al regarding non prosecution
Case Code Year
Case between Vipina Vijayan et al vs Geetha Suresh et al regarding non prosecution