Case Summary
The plaintiff, Vipin Raj, was absent for several court postings, including the day of the hearing. The court dismissed the case for non-prosecution due to the plaintiff's lack of interest in proceeding.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court found the plaintiff continuously absent and determined that the plaintiff was not interested in proceeding with the case.
Key Reasoning:
The plaintiff failed to appear and represent his case.
The plaintiff failed to appear and represent his case.
Why Defendant Won:
The plaintiff failed to appear and represent his case.
The plaintiff failed to appear and represent his case.
Supporting Evidence
The court determined that the plaintiff's absence indicated a lack of interest in pursuing the case.
Judgment Evidence:
Hence this court is of the view that plaintiff not interested to proceed further. Hence suit dismissed for non prosecution.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Vipin Raj
- Party Age
- 36
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Sreekumari Sreekumar
- Party Age
- 51
- Relation
- W/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Anish.S.
- Party Age
- 34
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Shaji N.A.
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- K. R. vinod
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- M.s. Letha
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Aswin Venugopal
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Joseph N.A.
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Tahul S.
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sreelekha K.S.
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Rahul S.
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Liya Thankachan
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Jacquelin Jackson
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Mohammed Razali
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Dismissed
Description:
Suit dismissed for non prosecution due to the plaintiff's continuous absence.
Evidence:
Hence this court is of the view that plaintiff not interested to proceed further. Hence suit dismissed for non prosecution.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Vipin Raj vs Sreekumari Sreekumar et al regarding non prosecution of the suit.
Case Code Year
Case between Vipin Raj vs Sreekumari Sreekumar et al regarding non prosecution of the suit.