Case Summary
Vinu K. Joy filed a suit for declaration and permanent prohibitory injunction against T. P. Varghese. The case was settled amicably in mediation, leading to a joint compromise petition between the parties.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court accepted the compromise between the parties, declaring that Vinu K. Joy is entitled to the property and that T. P. Varghese has relinquished all rights to it. The counterclaim filed by T. P. Varghese was dismissed.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The parties reached a lawful compromise, which was accepted by the court.
The parties reached a lawful compromise, which was accepted by the court.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The parties reached a lawful compromise, which was accepted by the court.
The parties reached a lawful compromise, which was accepted by the court.
Supporting Evidence
During the pendency of the proceedings, the parties reported that the entire dispute has been amicably settled in mediation and they filed a joint compromise petition.
Judgment Evidence:
Accordingly, the suit is decreed as follows: It is hereby declared that the plaintiff is entitled to the plaint C schedule property. The counterclaim filed by the defendant stands dismissed in view of the compromise.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Vinu K. Joy
- Party Age
- 47
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- T. P. Varghese
- Party Age
- 70
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Eldo Mani
- Party Age
- 52
- Relation
- Represented by
Plaintiffs Documents
Joint compromise petition dated 15.10.2025
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Paul K. Varghese
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- A. R. Bejoy
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Nikitha E. Wilson
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Rashmi S.
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- G. Govindan Nair
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- George Mathew
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- K. O. Santhosh
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Declaration
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
It is hereby declared that the plaintiff is entitled to the plaint C schedule property having an extent of 65 square metres in Re-survey No. 87/7.
Evidence:
It is hereby declared that the plaintiff is entitled to the plaint C schedule property having an extent of 65 square metres in Re-survey No. 87/7 (Old Survey Nos. 147/3 and 147/4B).
Relief Type:
Permanent Injunction
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
The defendant, his men, agents, representatives or anybody claiming through him are permanently restrained from trespassing into or in any manner interfering with the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the plaint C schedule property.
Evidence:
The defendant, his men, agents, representatives or anybody claiming through him are permanently restrained from trespassing into or in any manner interfering with the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the plaint C schedule property.
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Dismissed
Description:
The counterclaim filed by the defendant stands dismissed in view of the compromise.
Evidence:
The counterclaim filed by the defendant stands dismissed in view of the compromise.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Perumbavoor
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Vinu K. Joy vs T. P. Varghese regarding declaration and permanent prohibitory injunction
Case Code Year
Case between Vinu K. Joy vs T. P. Varghese regarding declaration and permanent prohibitory injunction
Case Flags
Adalath Resolved
Out-of-Court Settlement