Case Summary
Vinitha A.S is the plaintiff, and Arone is the defendant in this case. The suit was dismissed for default due to the plaintiff's absence despite notice.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit was dismissed due to the plaintiff's absence in court despite being served notice.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
Hence Suit is dismissed for default.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Vinitha A.S
- Party Age
- 37
- Relation
- W/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Arone
- Party Age
- 40
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Simy M.D
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- T.K.Ajith kumar
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Aswani Jyothy A.S
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Rejected
Description:
Suit dismissed for default due to absence of the plaintiff.
Evidence:
Hence Suit is dismissed for default.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Vinitha A.S vs Arone regarding dismissal for default
Case Code Year
Case between Vinitha A.S vs Arone regarding dismissal for default