Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S. No. 735/2024

Case between Vinitha A S vs P N Sudhakaran regarding civil suit

Court
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Smt. Needi.K.Dinamany
Order Date
2025-08-12
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The case involves a civil suit filed by Vinitha A S against P N Sudhakaran. The parties reached a settlement through mediation.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court decreed the suit as per the terms of the mediation agreement. The mediation agreement is included as part of the decree.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Refund court fee as per section 69 A of Kerala Court Fee and Suit Valuation Act.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court decreed the suit as per the terms of the mediation agreement. The mediation agreement is included as part of the decree.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The terms of the mediation agreement were found to be lawful.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The terms of the mediation agreement were found to be lawful.
Supporting Evidence
Terms of mediation agreement is found to be lawful.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence suit is decreed as per terms of mediation agreement.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Vinitha A S
Party Age
37
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
P N Sudhakaran
Party Age
74
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
M B Sandeep
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sreeja K P
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Aswathy Jayaraj
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Vishnu K K
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sudheesh R
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
M Manju
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Vinay John A J
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Merin Thomas
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Mithun P
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Suit is decreed as per terms of mediation agreement.
Evidence:
Hence suit is decreed as per terms of mediation agreement.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Vinitha A S vs P N Sudhakaran regarding civil suit
Case Code Year
Case between Vinitha A S vs P N Sudhakaran regarding civil suit

Case Flags

Out-of-Court Settlement

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Fri, 08/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Sun, 08/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
95%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between T.O Abraham et al vs T.O Aleyas et al regarding settlement of the suit
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between Prakash Pai, et al vs Saju, et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Nithya vs Babu et al regarding Dismissal of Listed Case
THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Kunju Bava vs C. A Abdulla regarding specific performance of agreement and consequential reliefs
The Court of the Principal Munsiff, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Ammini M.N et al vs Sindhu et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won