Case Summary
Vineeth Kuriakose is the plaintiff, and he filed the suit against multiple defendants including V.S. Chandrasekharan and others. The court dismissed the case as not pressed.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the suit as not pressed.
Key Reasoning:
The suit was dismissed as the plaintiff did not press the case.
The suit was dismissed as the plaintiff did not press the case.
Why Defendant Won:
The suit was dismissed as the plaintiff did not press the case.
The suit was dismissed as the plaintiff did not press the case.
Supporting Evidence
The court stated that the suit was dismissed as not pressed.
Judgment Evidence:
Dismissed as not pressed.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Vineeth Kuriakose
- Party Age
- 49
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- V.S. Chandrasekharan
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Mariyapuram Sreekumar
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- C. Vathsalan
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- K.Sudhakaran
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Indian Lawyers Congress
- Relation
- Rept. By its President
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- P. Viswananthan
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Ajith Viswananthan
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Shibu Joseph
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Balram S. A
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- V. C Xavier
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sarath Viswanathan
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Pooja P. O
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Jithin Alexander
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Wafa Maryam
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- C.B Gautham
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Abraham K. John
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Ajwin P. Lalson
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- P. Lakshmi
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Aysha E.M
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- V. C Sabu
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Fathima H
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Antony Varghese
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Ghosh Yohannan
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- N. Reghunath
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Thushara V
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Dismissed
Description:
The suit was dismissed as not pressed.
Evidence:
Dismissed as not pressed.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Vineeth Kuriakose vs V.S. Chandrasekharan et al regarding dismissal of suit
Case Code Year
Case between Vineeth Kuriakose vs V.S. Chandrasekharan et al regarding dismissal of suit