Case Summary
This suit is filed by the plaintiffs for prohibitory and mandatory injunction under the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908. The defendants were represented while the plaintiffs were absent.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The plaintiffs were absent and did not have any representation in court. The suit was dismissed for default as a result.
Key Reasoning:
Plaintiffs failed to appear in court and did not provide representation.
Plaintiffs failed to appear in court and did not provide representation.
Why Defendant Won:
Not available
Not available
Supporting Evidence
Plaintiff absent, no representation. Defendant absent, represented.
Judgment Evidence:
Suit dismissed for default.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Vilasini
- Party Age
- 74
- Relation
- W/o.Late Divakaran
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Sheela Divakar
- Party Age
- 52
- Relation
- D/o.Vilasini, and W/o.Suresh Babu
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Suresh Babu
- Party Age
- 54
- Relation
- S/o.Sudhakaran
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Shanu Divakar
- Party Age
- 40
- Relation
- S/o.Divakaran
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Shyla Divakar
- Party Age
- 52
- Relation
- D/o.Vilasini
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Sheeja
- Party Age
- 46
- Relation
- D/o.Haimavathy
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Haimavathy
- Party Age
- 75
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Babu
- Party Age
- 54
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Nizamuddin @ Sabu
- Party Age
- 48
- Relation
- S/o.Yahiy
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- R. Sam
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- U. Ullas Kumar
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Rajeev C
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Kishore Kumar.M
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Mandatory Injunction
Outcome:
Refused
Description:
The plaintiff sought prohibitory and mandatory injunctions.
Evidence:
Suit dismissed for default.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Vilasini et al vs Sheeja et al regarding prohibitory and mandatory injunction
Case Code Year
Case between Vilasini et al vs Sheeja et al regarding prohibitory and mandatory injunction