Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S. No. 1 15 1/ 2 0 22

Case between Viju P J vs Antony P F regarding dismissal of suit

Court
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Smt. Needi.K.Dinamany
Order Date
2026-01-06
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Viju P J filed a suit against Antony P F. The case was dismissed as the plaintiff did not intend to proceed with the suit.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The suit has been dismissed due to the plaintiff's absence and lack of intention to proceed.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit has been dismissed due to the plaintiff's absence and lack of intention to proceed.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
Supporting Evidence

Judgment Evidence:

Satisfied that plaintiff does not intend to proceed with suit. Suit is dismissed.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Viju P J
Party Age
46
Relation
S/o late Joseph
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Antony P F
Party Age
46
Relation
S/o Francis
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
A Balagopalan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
A Rajagopalan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
M N Manmadan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sreedass K P
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Johans Jacob P
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Syam Sankar Panicker
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Prabhu Muralikrishna
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
George A Cherian
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Latha Susan Cherian
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Dismissed
Description:
Suit is dismissed due to plaintiff's absence and lack of proof affidavit.
Evidence:
Satisfied that plaintiff does not intend to proceed with suit. Suit is dismissed.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Viju P J vs Antony P F regarding dismissal of suit
Case Code Year
Case between Viju P J vs Antony P F regarding dismissal of suit

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Thu, 01/01/2026 - 12:00
To
Wed, 01/21/2026 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
75%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between T.O Abraham et al vs T.O Aleyas et al regarding settlement of the suit
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between Prakash Pai, et al vs Saju, et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Nithya vs Babu et al regarding Dismissal of Listed Case
THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Kunju Bava vs C. A Abdulla regarding specific performance of agreement and consequential reliefs
The Court of the Principal Munsiff, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Ammini M.N et al vs Sindhu et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won