Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS. No. 172/2020

Case between Viji.K.Pillai vs Merlin Justin et al regarding Realization of Money

Court
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Judge
Smt. Ragi.S.
Order Date
2025-11-24
Duration
approximately-6 years 6 months 21 days
Case Closed
Mon, 11/24/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiff, Viji.K.Pillai, filed a suit against the defendants, Merlin Justin and Antony Justin, for the recovery of a loan amounting to ₹4,40,000. The defendants failed to repay the loan as assured, leading the plaintiff to seek legal recourse.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court dismissed the plaintiff's suit, ruling that the plaintiff failed to prove the execution of the alleged promissory note and the claims were unsubstantiated.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the plaintiff's suit, ruling that the plaintiff failed to prove the execution of the alleged promissory note and the claims were unsubstantiated.
Key Reasoning:
The plaintiff failed to establish the execution of the alleged promissory note and the claims were legally inadmissible.
Why Defendant Won:
Not available
Supporting Evidence
The plaintiff has failed to establish the execution of the alleged promissory note and the alleged transaction. Therefore, the claim based on Exhibit A1 and Exhibit A2 is liable to be rejected.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the suit is dismissed with costs of defendants.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Viji.K.Pillai
Party Age
40
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Merlin Justin
Party Age
45
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Antony Justin
Party Age
50
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Promissory Note marked as Exhibit A1, another document marked as Exhibit A2.
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Panambil S.Jayakumar
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
R.Sam
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Refused
Description:
Plaintiff sought recovery of 4,40,000/- as per the promissory note.
Evidence:
Accordingly, the plaintiff has failed to establish the execution of the alleged promissory note and the alleged transaction.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Promissory Note
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Document executed by the first defendant evidencing the loan agreement with the plaintiff.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Promissory Note
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Document evidencing a subsequent loan transaction between the plaintiff and the defendants.
Reference:
Ext.A2

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Money and Loan Recovery
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Common Reasons
Recovery of money
Case Code
Case between Viji.K.Pillai vs Merlin Justin et al regarding Realization of Money
Case Code Year
Case between Viji.K.Pillai vs Merlin Justin et al regarding Realization of Money

Quick Facts

Location
Kollam
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Case Filed
Mon, 04/06/2020 - 12:00
Case Closed
Mon, 11/24/2025 - 12:00
From
Wed, 10/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Sun, 11/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
95%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between M/s.Canara Bank vs M/s.Dhanya Swayam Sahaya Sangam et al regarding Realisation of Money
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Sujeesh Mohan vs Rajkumar.R. regarding Realisation of Money
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between M/s. Canara Bank vs Jomi.M.Johnson et al regarding Realisation of Money.
The Court of the Munsiff, Kollam
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Canara Bank vs Sabarinatha.S et al regarding Realisation of Money
IN THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM.
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Canara Bank vs Abhilash Aravindakshan regarding Realisation of Money
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won