Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S. No.1217/2024

Case between Vijayan K vs Raghavendra K regarding compromise settlement

Court
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Smt. Needi.K.Dinamany
Order Date
2025-01-25
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The case involves a dispute between Vijayan K and Raghavendra K that has resulted in a compromise settlement. The court has accepted the terms of the compromise and decreed the suit accordingly.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court accepted the compromise agreement between the parties. The plaintiff is entitled to a refund of the court fee paid.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Refund of court fee paid under section 69 of Kerala Court Fees and Suit Valuation Act
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court accepted the compromise agreement between the parties. The plaintiff is entitled to a refund of the court fee paid.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The compromise terms were found to be lawful and satisfactory to the court.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The compromise terms were found to be lawful and satisfactory to the court.
Supporting Evidence
Terms of compromise is found to be lawful. Satisfied that whole claim of suit is settled between parties.

Judgment Evidence:

Suit is decreed as per terms of compromise entered.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Vijayan K
Party Age
59
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Raghavendra K
Party Age
54
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
P B Pradeep
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Muhammed Niyas K H
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Ajmal P A
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Hybin Jose P P
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Compromise is accepted and suit is decreed as per terms of compromise entered.
Evidence:
Satisfied that whole claim of suit is settled between parties. Hence compromise is accepted.
Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff is entitled to refund of court fee paid under section 69 of Kerala Court Fees and Suit Valuation Act.
Evidence:
Plaintiff is entitiled to refund of court fee paid under section 69 of Kerala Court Fees and Suit Valuation Act.
Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Lifting of the attachment order dated 22.11.24.
Evidence:
Attachment order dated 22.11.24 is lifted.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Vijayan K vs Raghavendra K regarding compromise settlement
Case Code Year
Case between Vijayan K vs Raghavendra K regarding compromise settlement

Case Flags

Out-of-Court Settlement

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam District
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Wed, 01/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Fri, 01/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
80%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between T.O Abraham et al vs T.O Aleyas et al regarding settlement of the suit
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between Prakash Pai, et al vs Saju, et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Nithya vs Babu et al regarding Dismissal of Listed Case
THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Kunju Bava vs C. A Abdulla regarding specific performance of agreement and consequential reliefs
The Court of the Principal Munsiff, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Ammini M.N et al vs Sindhu et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won