Case Summary
The plaintiff, Vijayam, sued the defendant, Parameswaran, regarding a monetary issue. The suit was rejected due to unpaid court fees.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court rejected the suit due to non-payment of court fees.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
Supporting Evidence
Not available
Judgment Evidence:
Suit is one for money. No Balance Court fee paid. Plaint rejected u/o VII Rule 11.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Vijayam
- Party Age
- 62
- Relation
- W/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Parameswaran
- Party Age
- 52
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. Najmudheen.P.
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri.C.P.Jamshid Rahman
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sri.Mujeeb Rahman.V.
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Rejected
Description:
Suit is one for money.
Evidence:
No Balance Court fee paid. Plaint rejected u/o VII Rule 11.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Vijayam vs Parameswaran regarding money.
Case Code Year
Case between Vijayam vs Parameswaran regarding money.