Case Summary
This case involves Veluthaparambath Moossahaji and Edakkat Sulailkha as petitioners against Rayaroth Kandiyil K. K. Rajeeshlal and Puthukkattil Bijeesh in a Rent Control Petition. The petitioners are seeking eviction due to non-payment of rent by the respondents.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Order of eviction and costs of the petition
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Final Judgment
No
The court found in favor of the petitioners as the respondents failed to pay the rent, and an order for eviction was issued.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The petitioners complied with the essential requirements under section 11(2)(b) of the Act and served notice to the respondents who did not respond.
The petitioners complied with the essential requirements under section 11(2)(b) of the Act and served notice to the respondents who did not respond.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The petitioners complied with the essential requirements under section 11(2)(b) of the Act and served notice to the respondents who did not respond.
The petitioners complied with the essential requirements under section 11(2)(b) of the Act and served notice to the respondents who did not respond.
Supporting Evidence
As far as Sec.11(2)(b) of the Act is concerned from the pleadings and from Ext.A1 agreement and A2 notice it is revealed that, the petitioners complied the essential requirement under section 11(2)(b) of the Act.
Judgment Evidence:
In the result, an order of eviction is passed u/s. 11(2)(b) of the Act. The respondents are directed to vacate the petition schedule shop room and to hand over the same to the petitioners within a period of one month from the date of this order.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- VELUTHAPARAMBATH MOOSSAHAJI
- Party Age
- 61
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- EDAKKATT SULAIKHA
- Party Age
- 46
- Relation
- D/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- RAYAROTH KANDIYIL K. K. RAJEESHLAL
- Party Age
- 43
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- PUTHUKKATTIL BIJEESH @VIJESH. K. P,
- Party Age
- 47
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Rent agreement dated 26.06.2006, Lawyer notice dated 13.06.2025, Postal Acknowledgment Card, Unclaimed Registered Cover.
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- C. R. Biju
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Eviction
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
The court ordered the respondents to vacate the petition schedule shop room.
Evidence:
The Rent Control Petition is allowed as follows: An order of eviction is passed u/s. 11(2)(b) of the Act.
Relief Type:
Costs
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
The petitioners are entitled to get the costs of the petition.
Evidence:
The petitioners are entitled to get the costs of the petition.
Documents & Evidence
Document Type:
Rent Agreement
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
The agreement establishes the lease terms and conditions for the shop room.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type:
Copy of Lawyer Notice
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
The notice was sent to the respondents regarding the default of rent payment.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type:
Postal Acknowledgment Card
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
The acknowledgment confirms receipt of the notice by the first respondent.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type:
Unclaimed Registered Cover
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document shows that the second respondent did not receive the notice.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Case Classification
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Category
Eviction and Rent Control
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Nadapuram
Common Reasons
Non-payment of rent
Case Code
Case between Veluthaparambath Moossahaji et al vs Rayaroth Kandiyil K. K. Rajeeshlal et al regarding arrears of rent
Case Code Year
Case between Veluthaparambath Moossahaji et al vs Rayaroth Kandiyil K. K. Rajeeshlal et al regarding arrears of rent