Case Summary
The case involves the decree holder Veenadharan and additional decree holders Shakunthala, Vinu Kumar, Vinod V, and Minimol against the judgment debtors Sherly, Nadira, and Sherifa Beevi. The matter pertains to an execution petition filed by the decree holder under the Code of Civil Procedure.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Case Type
Execution Petition
Final Judgment
No
The court found that the decree has been satisfied and thus the case is closed.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The decree holder represented that the decree was satisfied and the work was completed.
The decree holder represented that the decree was satisfied and the work was completed.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The decree holder represented that the decree was satisfied and the work was completed.
The decree holder represented that the decree was satisfied and the work was completed.
Supporting Evidence
Counsel submitted that, decree satisfied. Work completed. Counsel for Decree Holder endorsed as decree satisfied.
Judgment Evidence:
Pronounced by me in the open court on this the 19th day of July, 2025.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Veenadharan
- Party Age
- 69
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Shakunthala
- Party Age
- 63
- Relation
- W/o
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Vinu Kumar
- Party Age
- 41
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Vinod V
- Party Age
- 38
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Minimol
- Party Age
- 43
- Relation
- W/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Sherly
- Party Age
- 37
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Nadira
- Party Age
- 42
- Relation
- D/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Sherifa Beevi
- Party Age
- 37
- Relation
- D/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Decree Holder
- Advocate Name
- S.Harikumar
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Judgment Debtor
- Advocate Name
- Nithya R.S
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
E.P filed by the decree holder, decree satisfied.
Evidence:
Counsel submitted that, decree satisfied. Work completed. Counsel for Decree Holder endorsed as decree satisfied.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Execution Petition
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Veenadharan et al vs Sherly et al regarding execution proceedings.
Case Code Year
Case between Veenadharan et al vs Sherly et al regarding execution proceedings.