Case Summary
The plaintiff, Vasanthakumaran, filed a suit for declaration. The case was heard on July 30, 2025.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court rejected the plaint due to the plaintiff not remitting the balance court fee and failure to file an amendment application.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
Hence plaint rejected.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Vasanthakumaran
- Party Age
- 58
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Dharmarajan
- Party Age
- 55
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Devika Raju
- Party Age
- 45
- Relation
- D/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Raju
- Party Age
- 50
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- M.Saraswathy
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Kavanadu R.Jayakumar
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Declaration
Outcome:
Refused
Description:
Plaintiff's suit for declaration was not accepted due to the non-remittance of the Balance Court Fee.
Evidence:
Hence plaint rejected.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Vasanthakumaran vs Dharmarajan et al regarding Declaration
Case Code Year
Case between Vasanthakumaran vs Dharmarajan et al regarding Declaration