Case Summary
The case involves a restoration petition filed by the defendants due to an inability to file a written statement on time because the first defendant was undergoing renal treatment. The court allowed the petition after considering the medical certificate provided.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Restoration Petition
Final Judgment
No
The court allowed the restoration petition filed by the defendants due to the medical reasons for not submitting the written statement on time.
Key Reasoning:
The court found sufficient grounds based on the medical evidence provided by the 1st petitioner.
The court found sufficient grounds based on the medical evidence provided by the 1st petitioner.
Why Defendant Won:
The court found sufficient grounds based on the medical evidence provided by the 1st petitioner.
The court found sufficient grounds based on the medical evidence provided by the 1st petitioner.
Supporting Evidence
The 1st petitioner has produced the Medical Certificate. It would go to show that the 1st petitioner was undergoing hemodialysis thrice a week.
Judgment Evidence:
Hence in the interest of justice, This petition is allowed.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Valsala Sreedharan
- Party Age
- 66
- Relation
- W/o
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- T G Santhoshkumar
- Party Age
- 53
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- T G Chandrabose
- Party Age
- 69
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- P.K.Ramachandran
- Party Age
- 56
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- T K Syamala
- Party Age
- 53
- Relation
- W/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Harikumar
- Party Age
- 25
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Ria
- Party Age
- 23
- Relation
- W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- R Anilkumar
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- K Karjet
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Arathi Karjet
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
The petition was allowed in the interest of justice.
Evidence:
Hence in the interest of justice, This petition is allowed.
Documents & Evidence
Document Type:
Medical Certificate
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
The document was produced to show the first petitioner's health condition, justifying the late filing of the written statement.
Reference:
Case Classification
Case Type
Restoration Petition
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Kottayam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Valsala Sreedharan et al vs P.K.Ramachandran et al regarding Restoration of written statement
Case Code Year
Case between Valsala Sreedharan et al vs P.K.Ramachandran et al regarding Restoration of written statement