Case Summary
Vallil Jamal is the petitioner in this case against Nedumparambil Bessy and others. The petition concerns an RPIA matter.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Case Type
RPIA
Final Judgment
No
The court allowed the RPIA petition.
Why Plaintiff Won:
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
RPIA allowed. Put up with back records.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- VALLIL JAMAL
- Party Age
- 58
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- NEDUMPARAMBIL BESSY
- Party Age
- 56
- Relation
- D/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- NEDUMPARAMBIL DENNAN
- Party Age
- 55
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- NEDUMPARAMBIL LOPPUS
- Party Age
- 55
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Petitioner
- Advocate Name
- Sri. C. R. Biju
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Respondent
- Advocate Name
- Sri. A. Santhosh
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
RPIA allowed.
Evidence:
ORDER Both sides represented. Costs paid as directed. RPIA allowed.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
RPIA
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Nadapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between VALLIL JAMAL vs NEDUMPARAMBIL BESSY et al regarding RPIA.
Case Code Year
Case between VALLIL JAMAL vs NEDUMPARAMBIL BESSY et al regarding RPIA.