Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S. No.385/2021

Case between V. Shreekumar vs A. Ahammedkutty et al regarding dismissal due to abatement

Court
THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Judge
Smt. REEJA R. NAIR.
Order Date
2024-07-31
Duration
approximately-3 years
Case Closed
Wed, 07/31/2024 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiff, V. Shreekumar, passed away during the course of the suit. The court dismissed the suit as abated due to the absence of legal heirs being impleaded.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court dismissed the suit as abated due to the plaintiff's passing and the lack of action to implead legal heirs.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the suit as abated due to the plaintiff's passing and the lack of action to implead legal heirs.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
Supporting Evidence

Judgment Evidence:

Hence, suit is dismissed as abated.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
V. Shreekumar
Party Age
54
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
A. Ahammedkutty
Party Age
84
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Renuka Venkateswaran
Party Age
58
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Muthukumar
Party Age
50
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Vinod K.V.
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Anand Sankar
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sunil N
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Abhijith Balakrishnan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
M.R. Rajesh
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
E.S. Sandhya
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Dismissed
Description:
The suit was dismissed as abated due to the plaintiff's death.
Evidence:
Hence, suit is dismissed as abated.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Death Certificate
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
Produced as evidence of the plaintiff's death.
Reference:

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between V. Shreekumar vs A. Ahammedkutty et al regarding dismissal due to abatement
Case Code Year
Case between V. Shreekumar vs A. Ahammedkutty et al regarding dismissal due to abatement

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Sat, 07/31/2021 - 12:00
Case Closed
Wed, 07/31/2024 - 12:00
From
Mon, 07/01/2024 - 12:00
To
Wed, 07/31/2024 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between T.O Abraham et al vs T.O Aleyas et al regarding settlement of the suit
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between Prakash Pai, et al vs Saju, et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Nithya vs Babu et al regarding Dismissal of Listed Case
THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Kunju Bava vs C. A Abdulla regarding specific performance of agreement and consequential reliefs
The Court of the Principal Munsiff, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Ammini M.N et al vs Sindhu et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won