Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S. No. 645/2019

Case between V S Lalan vs Chalikkavattom Thrikkovil Kshethra Punaruddarana Samithy regarding amendment of written statement

Court
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Smt. Needi.K.Dinamany.
Order Date
2025-03-19
Duration
approximately-5 years 0 days
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

This case involves a petition filed by the defendant to amend their written statement in a suit for permanent prohibitory injunction. The plaintiff argues against the amendment, stating that it is improper and untimely.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The petition to amend the written statement was dismissed by the court. The court found no merit in permitting the amendment after the trial had commenced.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The petition to amend the written statement was dismissed by the court. The court found no merit in permitting the amendment after the trial had commenced.
Key Reasoning:
The petition was found to be belated and not necessary for proper adjudication of the suit.
Why Defendant Won:
The petition was found to be belated and not necessary for proper adjudication of the suit.
Supporting Evidence
The present amendment contradicts the original written statement. It was determined that allowing the amendment would irretrievably prejudice the plaintiff.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, petition is dismissed with costs of Rs.500/-.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
V S Lalan
Party Age
58
Relation
S/o late Sankunny
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Chalikkavattom Thrikkovil Kshethra Punaruddarana Samithy
Relation
represented by its President, E P Thirumeni
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Baiju S S
Party Age
56
Relation
S/o Sivaprasad
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Lincy Glancy
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Tony Petta
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Refused
Description:
Petition for amendment of the written statement
Evidence:
this court is satisfied that there is no merits in the present petition and also the petition is highly belated

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between V S Lalan vs Chalikkavattom Thrikkovil Kshethra Punaruddarana Samithy regarding amendment of written statement
Case Code Year
Case between V S Lalan vs Chalikkavattom Thrikkovil Kshethra Punaruddarana Samithy regarding amendment of written statement

Quick Facts

Location
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Tue, 01/01/2019 - 12:00
Case Closed
From
Sat, 03/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Mon, 03/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
80%

Involved Entities

Private Individual

Similar Cases

Case between Garden View Apartment owners Association vs Ansal River Dale owners Association et al regarding Restoration Petition
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Shanoj R vs Joseph Augustin et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between M/s Indo Quartz vs M/s Ray Engineering Pvt. Ltd. et al regarding petition under Order 38 Rule 5 of Code of Civil Procedure.
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between M/s. Canton Residency Pvt. Ltd. vs Kalamassery Municipality regarding dismissal of suit
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Mrs. Julie Sebastian vs SREECHAND SPECIALITY HOSPITAL PVT. LTD. regarding settlement of claims.
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won