Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S No. 130/2020

Case between V. J Vincent et al vs V. J Raphel et al regarding suit dismissal

Court
THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Sri. Rohit Nandakumar
Order Date
2024-11-05
Duration
approximately-4 years 5 months
Case Closed
Tue, 11/05/2024 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

This case involves V. J Vincent and related plaintiffs against V. J Raphel and other defendants regarding a suit. The court dismissed the case due to the absence of necessary parties.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court dismissed the suit against the first defendant as they are a necessary party to the suit. The suit could not be maintained and was ultimately dismissed.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the suit against the first defendant as they are a necessary party to the suit. The suit could not be maintained and was ultimately dismissed.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
Supporting Evidence

Judgment Evidence:

Hence suit dismissed against D1. As D1 is necessary party to suit, suit cannot be maintained and is dismissed.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
V. J Vincent
Party Age
52
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Molly Vincent
Party Age
61
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Siju Vincent
Party Age
38
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Sibin Vincent
Party Age
36
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Siya Vincent
Party Age
34
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
V. J Raphel
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Rajeena
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
V. J Philomina @ Soyama
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
V.J John @ Joshy
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
V. J Martin
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Mary Ranzom Louiz
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Paul Dalin
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Nishani D. N
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Dismissed
Description:
Suit dismissed against D1 as it cannot be maintained.
Evidence:
Hence suit dismissed against D1. As D1 is necessary party to suit, suit cannot be maintained and is dismissed.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between V. J Vincent et al vs V. J Raphel et al regarding suit dismissal
Case Code Year
Case between V. J Vincent et al vs V. J Raphel et al regarding suit dismissal

Quick Facts

Location
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Thu, 11/05/2020 - 12:00
Case Closed
Tue, 11/05/2024 - 12:00
From
Fri, 11/01/2024 - 12:00
To
Sat, 11/30/2024 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
75%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between T.O Abraham et al vs T.O Aleyas et al regarding settlement of the suit
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between Prakash Pai, et al vs Saju, et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Nithya vs Babu et al regarding Dismissal of Listed Case
THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Kunju Bava vs C. A Abdulla regarding specific performance of agreement and consequential reliefs
The Court of the Principal Munsiff, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Ammini M.N et al vs Sindhu et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won