Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS.No.2098 /2011

Case between V. Chandramathi et al vs V. Chandramathi et al regarding decree as per the terms of the compromise

Court
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Judge
Sri. Mithun Gopi.G.S
Order Date
2025-01-06
Duration
Case Code No.
2098
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiffs, led by V. Chandramathi and P. Thulaseedharan, are involved in a case against the defendants, also led by V. Chandramathi. The case revolves around the terms of a compromise reached between the parties.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court ruled in favor of the plaintiffs based on the lawful terms of a compromise petition presented by both parties. The suits were decreed as per the compromise.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Case Type
Final Judgment
No
The court ruled in favor of the plaintiffs based on the lawful terms of a compromise petition presented by both parties. The suits were decreed as per the compromise.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The parties filed a compromise petition, and its terms were found lawful.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The parties filed a compromise petition, and its terms were found lawful.
Supporting Evidence
The terms of the compromise petition found lawful.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence, OS.2098/2011 and OS.31/2012 are decreed as per the terms of the compromise.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
V. Chandramathi
Party Age
61
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
P. Thulaseedharan
Party Age
56
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
V. Vimala
Party Age
53
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
V. Sarojam
Party Age
52
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
P. Rajan
Party Age
51
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
V. Usha
Party Age
46
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
C. Appu
Party Age
71
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Udayakumar
Party Age
40
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Murukan
Party Age
55
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Kalpakam
Party Age
58
Plaintiffs Documents
Judgment of Hon’ble High Court of Kerala in OP(c) No. 3005/2015 dated 12-11-2024
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. G. Rajeev
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Smt. Salini R.S
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Smt. Vinusha. M.V
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. Rajeev S.S
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. S.R. Presith
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The suits were decreed as per the terms of the compromise.
Evidence:
Hence, OS.2098/2011 and OS.31/2012 are decreed as per the terms of the compromise.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Judgment
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The court referred to the judgment of the Hon’ble High Court of Kerala in OP(c) No. 3005/2015 dated 12-11-2024 as part of the proceedings.
Reference:
null
Document Type: Compromise petition
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The court decreed OS.2098/2011 and OS.31/2012 as per the terms of the compromise petition.
Reference:
null

Case Classification

Case Type
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
OS.NO.
Case Code Year
2011

Quick Facts

Location
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Wed, 01/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Fri, 01/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
85%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Purushothaman Pillay Divakaran et al vs Deepti Sivan regarding injunction
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Sreenath.S vs Thankarajan et al regarding dismissal of suit as not pressed
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Sindhu.S et al vs Lalitha et al regarding withdrawal of suit
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Vanitha Sureshbabu Thilak vs Babu Chettiyar et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Anitha Kumari.L.K et al vs Madhu.S et al regarding an ad-interim injunction.
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF- III
Injunction Plaintiff Won