Case Summary
The plaintiff, Ushakumary, filed a suit for fixation of boundary and injunction. The defendants are Nandini and B.Satheesh Chandran.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit was dismissed as not pressed by the plaintiff.
Key Reasoning:
The plaintiff chose not to press the case.
The plaintiff chose not to press the case.
Why Defendant Won:
The plaintiff chose not to press the case.
The plaintiff chose not to press the case.
Supporting Evidence
The plaintiff chose not to press the case.
Judgment Evidence:
Plaintiff present. Filed not press memo vide CF No. 5439/25. Suit dismissed as not pressed.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Ushakumary
- Party Age
- 55
- Relation
- W/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Nandini
- Party Age
- 56
- Relation
- D/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- B.Satheesh Chandran
- Party Age
- 49
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- B. N. Haskar
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Alex Thomas-D1
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Parvathy V.Nair -D2
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Injunction
Outcome:
Dismissed
Description:
The suit is filed for fixation of boundary and injunction.
Evidence:
Suit dismissed as not pressed.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Ushakumary vs Nandini et al regarding fixation of boundary and injunction
Case Code Year
Case between Ushakumary vs Nandini et al regarding fixation of boundary and injunction