Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS.No.1334/2024

Case between Usha.D Kunju vs Luboy D Kunju et al regarding a compromise agreement

Court
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Judge
Smt. Salini.B.
Order Date
2025-10-16
Duration
Case Code No.
1334
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Usha.D Kunju is the plaintiff in this case against Luboy D Kunju and others. The case was regarding a compromise agreement which the court found to be lawful and decreed accordingly.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court allowed the compromise agreement between the parties and decreed the suit in terms of that agreement.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court allowed the compromise agreement between the parties and decreed the suit in terms of that agreement.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The Agreement entered into by both parties was found to be lawful.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The Agreement entered into by both parties was found to be lawful.
Supporting Evidence
Iam satisfied that the Agreement entered into both parties is lawful.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence suit is decreed in terms of compromise agreement. The compromise agreement shall form part of the decree.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Usha.D Kunju
Party Age
69
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Luboy D Kunju
Party Age
85
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Nisha Joy
Party Age
44
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Lalitha
Party Age
53
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Andrew D Kunju
Party Age
31
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Judy D Kunju
Party Age
29
Relation
D/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. Arun. R
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri. K. Murlaleedharan Nair
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Smt. Shubha.S
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The suit is decreed in terms of the compromise agreement.
Evidence:
Hence suit is decreed in terms of compromise agreement.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Compromise agreement
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
The court allowed the compromise agreement and decreed the suit in terms of this agreement.
Reference:
IA 9/2025

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
OS.NO.
Case Code Year
2024

Case Flags

Out-of-Court Settlement

Quick Facts

Location
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Wed, 10/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Fri, 10/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
100%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Union Bank of India et al vs Midhun. M regarding rejection of plaint
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Purushothaman Pillay Divakaran et al vs Deepti Sivan regarding injunction
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Sreenath.S vs Thankarajan et al regarding dismissal of suit as not pressed
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Sindhu.S et al vs Lalitha et al regarding withdrawal of suit
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Vanitha Sureshbabu Thilak vs Babu Chettiyar et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won