Case Summary
The case involves a plaintiff named Usha who is suing the defendant Maniyamma for the realisation of money. The suit was coming for hearing and the plaintiff was absent on the given date.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court rejected the case on the grounds of the plaintiff's absence and lack of instructions from her counsel.
Key Reasoning:
The plaintiff was absent for the hearing, leading to rejection of the case.
The plaintiff was absent for the hearing, leading to rejection of the case.
Why Defendant Won:
The plaintiff was absent for the hearing, leading to rejection of the case.
The plaintiff was absent for the hearing, leading to rejection of the case.
Supporting Evidence
The plaintiff absent represented. Counsel submitted that no instruction from plaintiff.
Judgment Evidence:
Pronounced by me in the open court on this the 18th day of August, 2025. The court rejected the case.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Usha
- Party Age
- 52
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Maniyamma
- Party Age
- 53
- Relation
- W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Bijimol.K
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- R.Gopakumar
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Poul Antony
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Suseela Paul
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Usha vs Maniyamma regarding realisation of money
Case Code Year
Case between Usha vs Maniyamma regarding realisation of money