Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S. No. 686 /2024

Case between Usha M P vs Preetha regarding suit filed under Order VII Rule 1

Court
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Smt. Needi.K.Dinamany
Order Date
2025-06-20
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiff Usha M P filed a suit against the defendant Preetha. The case was dismissed for default as the plaintiff did not show interest in continuing the suit.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The case was dismissed for default as the plaintiff was absent and did not take steps to issue summons to the defendant in the correct address.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The case was dismissed for default as the plaintiff was absent and did not take steps to issue summons to the defendant in the correct address.
Key Reasoning:
The plaintiff showed no interest in proceeding with the case.
Why Defendant Won:
The plaintiff showed no interest in proceeding with the case.
Supporting Evidence
The plaintiff was absent no representation. No steps seen taken to issue summons to defendant in correct address inspite of giving several chances.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence satisfied that plaintiff is not interested to continue with suit. Hence suit is dismissed for default.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Usha M P
Party Age
52
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Preetha
Party Age
50
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Dilish K John
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Reshma Mohan
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Dismissed
Description:
Plaintiff's suit dismissed for default as no representation was made.
Evidence:
Hence satisfied that plaintiff is not interested to continue with suit. Hence suit is dismissed for default.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Usha M P vs Preetha regarding suit filed under Order VII Rule 1
Case Code Year
Case between Usha M P vs Preetha regarding suit filed under Order VII Rule 1

Quick Facts

Location
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Sun, 06/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Mon, 06/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
80%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between T.O Abraham et al vs T.O Aleyas et al regarding settlement of the suit
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between Prakash Pai, et al vs Saju, et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Nithya vs Babu et al regarding Dismissal of Listed Case
THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Kunju Bava vs C. A Abdulla regarding specific performance of agreement and consequential reliefs
The Court of the Principal Munsiff, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Ammini M.N et al vs Sindhu et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won