Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS. No. 48/2017

Case between Unnikrishnan et al vs Anil Raj.T regarding mandatory injunction

Court
COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Judge
Smt. Sofia.T.A.
Order Date
2025-07-21
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

This suit was filed by the plaintiffs, Unnikrishnan and Simi, against the defendant, Anil Raj.T, for a mandatory injunction. The matter was settled through mediation, leading to a compromise between the parties.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court accepted the compromise made by the parties and decreed the suit in its terms.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Court fees paid by the Plaintiffs to be refunded.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court accepted the compromise made by the parties and decreed the suit in its terms.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The court found that a compromise was reached and accepted by both parties.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Not available
Supporting Evidence
I have gone through the compromise and I am satisfied that the parties had adjusted the plaintiff claim as a whole by the said compromise.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence the compromise is accepted and the suit is decreed in its terms.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Unnikrishnan
Party Age
42
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Simi
Party Age
30
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Anil Raj.T
Party Age
42
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
S.Sivaraj
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
D.Ushakumari
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
G.S.Krishnakumar
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Mandatory Injunction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The suit is decreed in its terms as the parties had entered into a compromise.
Evidence:
Hence the compromise is accepted and the suit is decreed in its terms.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Unnikrishnan et al vs Anil Raj.T regarding mandatory injunction
Case Code Year
Case between Unnikrishnan et al vs Anil Raj.T regarding mandatory injunction

Case Flags

Adalath Resolved
Out-of-Court Settlement

Quick Facts

Location
Kollam
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Tue, 07/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Sun, 08/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
80%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Vijayendran, Chithra vs Yamunadevi regarding review of order
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Navasudeen.S vs Sira Group regarding review of an earlier order
Court of the Munsiff, Kollam
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Sajeev vs T.Unnikrishna Pillai regarding setting aside an exparte decree.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Gopakumar vs K.S.Abdul Manaf regarding Realisation of Money
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM.
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Bank of India vs Shibina. S et al regarding dismissal of suit as not pressed.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won