O.S. No. 247/2020

Case between Union Bank of India vs Viswambharan K.K. regarding default in steps taken.

Court

THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER, ERNAKULAM

Judge

Smt. REEJA R. NAIR.

Order Date

2024-11-15

Duration

approximately-4 years

Case Closed

Fri, 11/15/2024 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiff, Union Bank of India represented by its branch manager, filed a suit against the defendant, Viswambharan K.K. The court found that the plaintiff had not taken necessary steps since 2022.

Judgment Outcome

Judgment Favored

Defendant

Relief Granted

Case Type

Civil Suit

Final Judgment

The suit was dismissed for default due to lack of necessary steps by the plaintiff.

Key Reasoning:
Plaintiff did not take required steps for a considerable time despite direction.

Why Defendant Won:
Plaintiff did not take required steps for a considerable time despite direction.

Supporting Evidence

no steps seen taken so far by the plaintiff inspite of specific direction to that effect.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence the suit is dismissed for default.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role: Plaintiff
Party Name: Union Bank of India Kalamassery Branch
Relation: Represented by

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Viswambharan K.K.
Party Age: 66
Relation: S/o

Plaintiffs Documents

Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role: Plaintiff
Advocate Name: Arun B. Varghese
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Party Role: Plaintiff
Advocate Name: Vipin D.G.
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Party Role: Plaintiff
Advocate Name: Aishwarya V.S.
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Party Role: Plaintiff
Advocate Name: Karol Mathews Sebastian Alenchery
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other

Outcome: Dismissed

Description:

The suit was dismissed for default due to the plaintiff's failure to take steps despite specific directions.

Evidence: