Case Summary
The Union Bank of India filed a suit against Dasan P.K and Beena Dasan regarding a matter that the court eventually rejected. The case involved a hearing on June 6, 2024.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court ruled against the plaintiff due to lack of representation and failure to remit the requisite fee. As a result, the suit was rejected.
Key Reasoning:
The suit was rejected
The suit was rejected
Why Defendant Won:
The suit was rejected
The suit was rejected
Supporting Evidence
The court rejected the suit due to lack of representation and non-remittance of the court fee.
Judgment Evidence:
The court on the same day delivered the following: No representation. BCF not remitted. Plaintiff rejected.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Union Bank of India
- Relation
- Represented by
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Dasan P.K
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Beena Dasan
- Relation
- W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sajitha S. Dharan
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- K.R Vinod
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Krishna Bindhu
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Rejected
Description:
The suit was rejected.
Evidence:
Plaint rejected.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Union Bank of India vs Dasan P.K et al regarding rejection of suit
Case Code Year
Case between Union Bank of India vs Dasan P.K et al regarding rejection of suit