Case Summary
This case involves a petition by the defendant, C V Anob Kumar, who seeks details from the plaintiff, Union Bank of India, regarding a composite debit balance confirmation. The plaintiff opposes the petition, stating it aims to delay proceedings.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Plaintiff is directed to furnish the details of the bank manager during the execution of Ext.A6 composite debit balance confirmation acknowledgment.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court allowed the petition, directing the plaintiff to furnish details of the bank manager involved during the execution of the disputed document.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The court found that the requested information is crucial for a fair adjudication of the case.
The court found that the requested information is crucial for a fair adjudication of the case.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The court found that the requested information is crucial for a fair adjudication of the case.
The court found that the requested information is crucial for a fair adjudication of the case.
Supporting Evidence
Considering the pleadings of both sides, this court is satisfied that the identity and the details of the bank manager who oversaw the execution of Ext.A6 and his evidence is crucial for proving the plaintiff’s case as well as defendant's defence.
Judgment Evidence:
In the result, 1)Petition is allowed. Plaintiff is directed to furnish the details of the bank manager during the execution of Ext.A6 composite debit balance confirmation acknowledgment of debt dated 07.10.2020 and the name of the person who filled Ext. A6.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Union Bank of India
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- C V Anob Kumar
- Party Age
- 64
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Indian Passport (No. P0104567)
Advocates
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- C Anilkumar Kalleesseril
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- P M Manash
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Jain Varghese
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Aadil Nazarudeen
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- S K Balachandran
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- N D Deepa
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- K M Fathima
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- K M Biju
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
Defendant is seeking the identity of the bank manager who oversaw the execution of Ext.A6 and the name of the person who filled it.
Evidence:
Accordingly I find merit in the above petition.
Documents & Evidence
Document Type:
Composite debit balance confirmation
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
The court discussed the document in relation to the defendant's claim of forgery and the need to disclose details of the bank manager involved in its execution.
Reference:
Ext.A6
Document Type:
Passport
Submitted By:
Defendant
Relevance:
The defendant's passport was referenced to corroborate his claim of being in the UAE and unable to sign Ext.A6 during that period.
Reference:
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Realization of Money
Case Code
Case between Union Bank of India vs C V Anob Kumar regarding realization of money.
Case Code Year
Case between Union Bank of India vs C V Anob Kumar regarding realization of money.