O.S No. 1026/2023

Case between Ummer N vs Angelo Thomas, Binoy A.B regarding default dismissal

Court

THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM

Judge

Sri. Nanda Krishna M.

Order Date

2025-03-25

Duration

Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The case involves Ummer N as the plaintiff and Angelo Thomas and Binoy A.B as defendants. The suit was dismissed for default as the plaintiff did not appear or was not represented in court.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won

Interim Order

The suit filed by Ummer N was dismissed as he failed to appear in court. Notice had been served, but the plaintiff was absent.

Judgment Favored

Defendant

Relief Granted

Case Type

Civil Suit

Final Judgment

The suit filed by Ummer N was dismissed as he failed to appear in court. Notice had been served, but the plaintiff was absent.

Key Reasoning:
The plaintiff was absent and did not represent himself.

Why Defendant Won:
The plaintiff was absent and did not represent himself.

Supporting Evidence

Plaintiff absent. Not represented. Notice issued from the court to the plaintiff seen served. Name of the plaintiff called in the open court. Absent. Not represented.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence, suit is dismissed for default.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role: Plaintiff
Party Name: Ummer N
Party Age: 68
Relation: S/o

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Angelo Thomas
Party Age: 40
Relation: S/o

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Binoy A.B
Party Age: 43
Relation: S/o

Plaintiffs Documents

Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role: Plaintiff
Advocate Name: Akshay Joseph Adhikaram
Appearance Type: Main Counsel
Bar Registration: No vakalath – Legal Aid Counsel

Party Role: Defendant
Advocate Name: Joby Cyriac
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Party Role: Defendant
Advocate Name: Kurian K Jose
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other

Outcome: Dismissed

Description:

The suit is dismissed for default due to the plaintiff's absence.

Evidence: