Case Summary
The plaintiff, Uma Tading Company, represented by its Director T.V Rajendran Nair, filed a suit against Karthika Trading Company for fixation of boundary and permanent prohibitory injunction. The plaintiff was absent during the proceedings, leading to the dismissal of the suit for default.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit filed by the plaintiff was dismissed due to their absence on the day of the hearing.
Key Reasoning:
The plaintiff was absent and did not present evidence.
The plaintiff was absent and did not present evidence.
Why Defendant Won:
The plaintiff was absent and did not present evidence.
The plaintiff was absent and did not present evidence.
Supporting Evidence
The plaintiff was absent and did not present evidence.
Judgment Evidence:
Since the plaintiff remained absent and not ready to adduce any evidence suit dismissed for default.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Uma Tading Company
- Relation
- Represented by
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Karthika Trading Company
- Relation
- represented by
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Rahul Krishnan U.S
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Kiran Krishna
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Jani.A
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Amal S.R
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Renju. U.K
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Permanent Injunction
Outcome:
Not Decided
Description:
Suit filed for fixation of boundary and permanent prohibitory injunction.
Evidence:
Since the plaintiff remained absent and not ready to adduce any evidence suit dismissed for default.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Uma Tading Company vs Karthika Trading Company regarding fixation of boundary and permanent prohibitory injunction.
Case Code Year
Case between Uma Tading Company vs Karthika Trading Company regarding fixation of boundary and permanent prohibitory injunction.