Case Summary
Udayasankar filed a suit for injunction against Chithra Venugopal and Venugopal. The plaintiff was absent during the hearing, leading to the dismissal of the case.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Injunction
Final Judgment
No
The case was dismissed for default due to the plaintiff's absence and lack of evidence.
Key Reasoning:
Plaintiff was absent and did not present any evidence.
Plaintiff was absent and did not present any evidence.
Why Defendant Won:
Not available
Not available
Supporting Evidence
Plaintiff was absent and did not present any evidence.
Judgment Evidence:
As the plaintiff not ready to adduce any evidence, suit dismissed for default.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Udayasankar
- Party Age
- 48
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Chithra Venugopal
- Party Age
- 45
- Relation
- D/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Venugopal
- Party Age
- 52
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- N.B.Chandramohan
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- P.Deepa
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Injunction
Outcome:
Rejected
Description:
Suit dismissed for default as the plaintiff was not ready to adduce any evidence.
Evidence:
As the plaintiff not ready to adduce any evidence, suit dismissed for default.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Injunction
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Udayasankar vs Chithra Venugopal et al regarding Injunction
Case Code Year
Case between Udayasankar vs Chithra Venugopal et al regarding Injunction